Key result
Transcatheter PFO closure benefits selected patients with cryptogenic stroke and a high Risk of Paradoxical Embolism score or thrombophilia more than medical therapy alone.
Why the study?
Although PFO is an established risk factor for cryptogenic ischemic stroke, secondary prevention strategies remain controversial.
Does transcatheter PFO closure prevent secondary stroke in patients with PFO and cryptogenic stroke compared to medical therapy?
Does transcatheter PFO closure prevent secondary stroke in patients with PFO and cryptogenic stroke compared to medical therapy?
Transcatheter PFO closure is an evidence-based, guideline-supported therapy for secondary stroke prevention in selected patients with PFO and cryptogenic stroke.
Supports PFO closure in selected cryptogenic stroke patients; confirms recent RCT benefits for secondary prevention.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Although a patent foramen ovale (PFO) is an established risk factor for cryptogenic ischemic stroke, strategies for secondary prevention remain controversial. Increasing evidence over the past decade from well designed clinical trials supports transcatheter PFO closure for selected patients whose stroke was likely attributable to the PFO. However, patient selection using imaging findings, clinical scoring systems, and in some cases, thrombophilia testing, is crucial for determining patients most likely to benefit from closure, anticoagulation, or antiplatelet therapy. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies have found that patients with a high Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score and those with a thrombophilia benefit more from closure than medical therapy (including antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy) alone. Meta-analyses have demonstrated an increased short-term risk of atrial fibrillation in closure patients, and that residual shunt after closure predicts stroke recurrence. Last, recent data have been inconclusive as to whether patients receiving medical therapy only benefit more from anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy, so this remains an area of controversy. SUMMARY: Transcatheter PFO closure is an evidence-based, guideline-supported therapy for secondary stroke prevention in patients with a PFO and cryptogenic stroke. However, proper patient selection is critical to achieve benefit, and recent studies have helped clarify those patients most likely to benefit from closure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rhoades et al. (2021) conducted a review in Patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke. Transcatheter PFO closure vs. Medical therapy (antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy) was evaluated. Transcatheter PFO closure benefits selected patients with cryptogenic stroke and a high Risk of Paradoxical Embolism score or thrombophilia more than medical therapy alone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: