Key result
Chronic type 2 diabetes worsened post-ischaemic function by ~40% and increased cell death by 100%, abolishing ischaemic preconditioning protection, whereas type 1 diabetes preserved these responses.
Why the study?
Effects of diabetes on myocardial responses to ischaemia-reperfusion and cardioprotective stimuli remain contentious, potentially reflecting influences of disease duration and time of onset.
Does ischaemic preconditioning improve myocardial ischaemic tolerance in chronic type 1 and type 2 diabetic mouse models?
Does ischaemic preconditioning improve myocardial ischaemic tolerance in chronic type 1 and type 2 diabetic mouse models?
Chronic type 2 diabetes, but not type 1 diabetes, impairs myocardial ischaemic tolerance and abolishes the protective effects of ischaemic preconditioning in a mouse model.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Caution advised against extrapolating preconditioning to type 2 diabetes; leaves open translation of subtype differences to human cardioprotection.
New Findings • What is the central question of this study? What is the impact of chronic adult-onset diabetes on cardiac ischaemic outcomes and preconditioning? • What is the main finding and its importance? Chronic adult-onset type 2 but not type 1 diabetes significantly impairs myocardial ischaemic tolerance and ischaemic preconditioning. Preconditioning may be detrimental in type 2 diabetes, exaggerating nitrosative stress and apoptotic protein expression. Abstract Effects of diabetes on myocardial responses to ischaemia–reperfusion (I–R) and cardioprotective stimuli remain contentious, potentially reflecting influences of disease duration and time of onset. Chronic adult-onset type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) were modelled non-genetically in male C57Bl/6 mice via 5 × 50 mg kg−1 daily streptozotocin (STZ) injections + 12 weeks’ standard chow or 1 × 75 mg kg−1 STZ injection + 12 weeks’ obesogenic diet (32% calories as fat, 57% carbohydrate, 11% protein), respectively. Systemic outcomes were assessed and myocardial responses to I–R ± ischaemic preconditioning (IPC; 3 × 5 min I–R) determined in Langendorff perfused hearts. Uncontrolled T1D was characterised by pronounced hyperglycaemia (25 mm fasting glucose), glucose intolerance and ∼10% body weight loss, whereas T2D mice exhibited moderate hyperglycaemia (15 mm), hyperinsulinaemia, glucose intolerance and 17% weight gain. Circulating ghrelin, resistin and noradrenaline were unchanged with T1D, while leptin increased and noradrenaline declined in T2D mice. Ischaemic tolerance and IPC were preserved in T1D hearts. In contrast, T2D worsened post-ischaemic function (∼40% greater diastolic and contractile dysfunction) and cell death (100% higher troponin efflux), and abolished IPC protection. Whereas IPC reduced post-ischaemic nitrotyrosine and pro-apoptotic Bak and Bax levels in non-diabetic hearts, these effects were reduced in T1D and IPC augmented Bax and nitrosylation in T2D hearts. The data demonstrate chronic T1D does not inhibit myocardial I–R tolerance or IPC, whereas metabolic and endocrine disruption in T2D is associated with ischaemic intolerance and inhibition of IPC. Indeed, normally protective IPC may exaggerate damage mechanisms in T2D hearts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Russell et al. (2019) studied Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes. Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes models (STZ +/- obesogenic diet) vs. Non-diabetic mice was evaluated on Myocardial ischaemic tolerance and ischaemic preconditioning. Chronic type 2 diabetes worsened post-ischaemic function by ~40% and increased cell death by 100%, abolishing ischaemic preconditioning protection, whereas type 1 diabetes preserved these responses.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: