Key result
Ischemic preconditioning significantly reduced myocardial infarct size in both non-diabetic and type 2 diabetic rats irrespective of the duration of diabetes (ANOVA P<0.0001).
Why the study?
Does ischemic preconditioning reduce infarct size in a rat model of pre-, early, and late-stage type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Population
Male Zucker diabetic fatty rats (homozygote) at ages 6-, 12- and 24-weeks of age and their age-matched…
Comparison
Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) stimulus vs Control (no IPC)
Design
Preclinical, randomised
Authors
Loading...
IPC efficacy preserved across T2DM durations despite varying IR sensitivity; leaves open translation to human preconditioning strategies.
Does ischemic preconditioning reduce infarct size in a rat model of pre-, early, and late-stage type 2 diabetes mellitus?
p-value: p=<0.0001
Ischemic preconditioning preserves its cardioprotective effect against ischemia-reperfusion injury regardless of the duration of type 2 diabetes in a rat model.
Hjortbak et al. (2018) studied Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion Injury (n=112). Ischemic preconditioning vs. No ischemic preconditioning (control) was evaluated on Infarct size (p=<0.0001). Ischemic preconditioning significantly reduced myocardial infarct size in both non-diabetic and type 2 diabetic rats irrespective of the duration of diabetes (ANOVA P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: