Key result
Prasugrel and ticagrelor were associated with fewer ischaemic and bleeding events at all time points than clopidogrel in STEMI patients, partly because newer agents are used in less ill patients.
Why the study?
What are the real-world effectiveness and safety outcomes of different P2Y12 receptor inhibitors in patients with STEMI?
Observational (n=84,299)
Yes
What are the real-world effectiveness and safety outcomes of different P2Y12 receptor inhibitors in patients with STEMI?
Real-world European registry data show that death and bleeding rates for STEMI patients on P2Y12 inhibitors are lower than in Phase III trials, with better outcomes for newer agents partly driven by selection bias.
Caution against inferring superiority from registry data due to confounding; leaves open whether prasugrel or ticagrelor truly outperform clopidogrel in STEMI.
AIMS: Among acute coronary syndromes (ACS), ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has the most severe early clinical course. We aimed to describe the effectiveness and safety of P2Y12 receptor inhibitors in patients with STEMI based on the data from contemporary European ACS registries. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twelve registries provided data in a systematic manner on outcomes in STEMI patients overall, and seven of these also provided data for P2Y12 receptor inhibitor-based dual antiplatelet therapy. The registries were heterogeneous in terms of site, patient, and treatment selection, as well as in definition of endpoints (e.g. bleeding events). All-cause death rates based on the data from 84 299 patients (9612 patients on prasugrel, 11 492 on ticagrelor, and 27 824 on clopidogrel) ranged between 0.49 and 6.68% in-hospital, between 3.07 and 7.95% at 30 days (reported in 6 registries), between 8.15 and 9.13% at 180 days, and between 2.41 and 9.58% at 1 year (5 registries). Major bleeding rates were 0.09-3.55% in-hospital (8 registries), 0.09-1.65% at 30 days, and 1.96% at 1 year (only 1 registry). Fatal/life-threatening bleeding was rare occurring between 0.08 and 0.13% in-hospital (4 registries) and 1.96% at 1 year (1 registry). CONCLUSIONS: Real-world evidence from European contemporary registries shows that death, ischaemic events, and bleeding rates are lower than those reported in Phase III studies of P2Y12 inhibitors. Regarding individual P2Y12 inhibitors, patients on prasugrel, and, to a lesser degree, ticagrelor, had fewer ischaemic and bleeding events at all time points than clopidogrel-treated patients. These findings are partly related to the fact that the newer agents are used in younger and less ill patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Danchin et al. (2016) conducted an observational in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=84,299). P2Y12 receptor inhibitors (prasugrel, ticagrelor, clopidogrel) vs. Comparison between different P2Y12 inhibitors was evaluated on All-cause death and major bleeding. Prasugrel and ticagrelor were associated with fewer ischaemic and bleeding events at all time points than clopidogrel in STEMI patients, partly because newer agents are used in less ill patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: