Key result
Combining symbolic regression with a Cox proportional hazards model improved the prediction of heart failure deaths, increasing the C-index from 0.72 to 0.75 and the AUC from 0.78 to 0.82 compared to a standard Cox model.
Why the study?
Heart failure patients have a high mortality rate, and physicians require reliable prognostic predictions to guide decisions regarding devices, transplantation, medications, and palliative care.
Observational (n=299)
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Combining symbolic regression with Cox proportional hazards models improves the prediction of heart failure mortality by identifying non-linear transformations of standard clinical variables.
BACKGROUND: Heart failure is a clinical syndrome characterised by a reduced ability of the heart to pump blood. Patients with heart failure have a high mortality rate, and physicians need reliable prognostic predictions to make informed decisions about the appropriate application of devices, transplantation, medications, and palliative care. In this study, we demonstrate that combining symbolic regression with the Cox proportional hazards model improves the ability to predict death due to heart failure compared to using the Cox proportional hazards model alone. METHODS: We used a newly invented symbolic regression method called the QLattice to analyse a data set of medical records for 299 Pakistani patients diagnosed with heart failure. The QLattice identified non-linear mathematical transformations of the available covariates, which we then used in a Cox model to predict survival. RESULTS: An exponential function of age, the inverse of ejection fraction, and the inverse of serum creatinine were identified as the best risk factors for predicting heart failure deaths. A Cox model fitted on these transformed covariates had improved predictive performance compared with a Cox model on the same covariates without mathematical transformations. CONCLUSION: Symbolic regression is a way to find transformations of covariates from patients' medical records which can improve the performance of survival regression models. At the same time, these simple functions are intuitive and easy to apply in clinical settings. The direct interpretability of the simple forms may help researchers gain new insights into the actual causal pathways leading to deaths.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wilstrup et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=299). Cox model with covariates transformed by symbolic regression vs. Cox model with untransformed covariates was evaluated on Model predictive performance (C-index). Combining symbolic regression with a Cox proportional hazards model improved the prediction of heart failure deaths, increasing the C-index from 0.72 to 0.75 and the AUC from 0.78 to 0.82 compared to a standard Cox model.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: