Key result
Older age and higher frailty index link to increased carotid intima-media thickness across both sexes.
Why the study?
Normative carotid intima-media-thickness values across chronological age and biological age (frailty) are lacking for healthcare providers and researchers.
What are the sex-specific normative reference values and relationships for average and maximum carotid intima-media thickness across chronological age and frailty levels in middle-aged and older Canadian adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=10,209)
Yes
What are the sex-specific normative reference values and relationships for average and maximum carotid intima-media thickness across chronological age and frailty levels in middle-aged and older Canadian adults?
Provides the largest population-based, sex-specific normative reference values for average and maximum carotid intima-media thickness across both chronological age and frailty index (biological age) in middle-aged and older adults.
May support frailty alongside age for cIMT interpretation; extends sex-specific normative references to biological aging.
Objectives Carotid intima-media-thickness (cIMT) is predictive of future cardiovascular events, increases with chronological age, and greater in males. The accumulation of health deficits (or frailty) is a marker of biological age. However, normative cIMT values are lacking and would be an important comparative tool for healthcare providers and researchers. This study aimed to establish sex-specific normative cIMT values across chronological age and frailty levels (i.e. biological age). Methods Frailty and right common cIMT data were extracted from the Canadian Longitudinal Study of Aging baseline comprehensive cohort of middle-aged and older adults ( n = 10,209; 5000 females). cIMT was assessed via high-resolution ultrasound. Frailty was determined using a 52-item frailty index. Ordinary least squares and quantile regressions were conducted between age (years or frailty index) with cIMT (average or maximum), separately for males and females. Results In both sexes, average and maximum cIMT increased with higher chronological age and frailty. Both cIMT metrics increased non-linearly (quadratic-cIMT term) with advancing age (β-coefficients for quadratic and linear terms: all, p < 0.001), except for the linear relationship between average and maximum cIMT with chronological age among males ( p < 0.001). Sex-specific normative average and maximum cIMT values were established (1 st –99 th percentiles, 5% increments), separately for chronological and biological ages. Conclusions This is the largest sample of adults to establish normative cIMT outcomes that includes older adults. The chronological age and frailty-related normative cIMT outcomes will serve as a useful resource for healthcare professionals and researchers to establish “normal” age- and sex-specific cIMT values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Brien et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Middle-aged and older community-dwelling adults (n=10,209). Chronological age and frailty index (biological age) was evaluated on Right common carotid artery average and maximum intima-media thickness (cIMT) (linear-β 1.3 (average cIMT vs frailty in both sexes), 95% CI 1.1-1.5 (females); 1.0-1.5 (males), p=<0.001). Chronological age and frailty index were both significantly associated with higher average and maximum carotid intima-media thickness in males and females (all p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: