Since the late 1980s the “build-operate-transfer” concession, or BOT, has become a popular option in Asia for infrastructural privatisation. The experiences of several years suggest that BOT schemes are by nature too complex and fragile, and too highly prone to politicisation, to enable governments in developing countries to achieve the quick, efficient, and privately financed supply of infrastructure as intended by this method of privatisation. Across Asia the number of unqualified BOT successes has been few. A much greater number of attempted projects has been characterised by lengthy delays, chronic disputes, and frequently, failure to ever get underway. Even in the case of those which do proceed, the state often fails to attain its principal goals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paul Handley (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: