Key result
Medication administration errors in African anaesthetic practice are primarily caused by look-alike drug labels, syringe swaps, and fatigue, highlighting the need for double-checking and color-coded syringes.
Systematic Review
Medication administration errors in African anaesthetic practice are underreported but frequently involve substitution errors due to look-alike labels and syringe swaps, highlighting the need for double-checking and color-coded syringes.
Supports double-checking and color-coded syringes in African anaesthesia; extends global error-prevention data to this region.
Medication error is a significant issue of concern in medical practice because it can lead to severe and deleterious reaction. The issue is of more concern in anaesthetic practice in which medications are administered to interfere with the normal activity of the central nervous system so as to prevent pain associated with medical procedures. This papers reviews record of anaesthetic medication administration error in the African setting drawing from records of contemporary databases. Also the likely causes were enumerated and recommendations to ensure best practices. Overall 9 publications comprising 7 studies and 5 case reports were accessed from 3 countries (i.e. Nigeria, South Africa and Morocco). These error can be adequately checked by double checking of all medication label by a minimum of two Anaesthetist prior to administration, reducing Anaesthetics work load and introducing colour coding of syringes into national guidelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rotimi et al. (2014) conducted a systematic review in Medication administration error in anaesthetic practice. Medication administration errors was evaluated on Causes and types of medication administration errors. Medication administration errors in African anaesthetic practice are primarily caused by look-alike drug labels, syringe swaps, and fatigue, highlighting the need for double-checking and color-coded syringes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: