Key result
Compressed VDC/IE chemotherapy was associated with a 48% survival rate compared with 38% for VDC/IAE in paediatric patients with chest wall Ewing sarcoma.
Why the study?
Chest wall Ewing sarcoma has a reported 5-year survival ranging between 40% and 60%, prompting evaluation of the effect of different treatment modalities on survival outcomes in paediatric patients.
How do different treatment modalities affect 5-year survival outcomes in paediatric patients with chest wall Ewing sarcoma?
Cohort (n=46)
No
How do different treatment modalities affect 5-year survival outcomes in paediatric patients with chest wall Ewing sarcoma?
In paediatric chest wall Ewing sarcoma, surgery as local control with negative margins and compressed VDC/IE chemotherapy are associated with improved 5-year survival outcomes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Surgery alone for local control was associated with better survival; leaves open optimal multimodal sequencing in paediatric chest wall Ewing sarcoma.
Introduction: Chest wall Ewing sarcoma (EWS) is a common paediatric malignant tumour affecting the chest wall, accounting for about 10% of all EWS patients. Treatment typically involves intense chemotherapy, complete surgical resection when possible and/or radiation. The EWS of the chest wall has a reported 5-year survival ranging between 40% and 60% in most studies. The following study evaluated the effect of different treatment modalities on survival outcomes in paediatric patients. Methodology: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study that included 46 patients diagnosed with chest wall EWS between January 2011 and December 2023 at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Center. Approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board for this study. The 5-year follow up period and outcomes were analysed using the SPSS. Results: The cohort included 46 patients (56% female, 44% male) with a median age of 10 years. Non-metastatic disease was observed in 94% of the patients. The compressed vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide and etoposide chemotherapy regimen showed better outcomes, with a 48% survival rate compared with 38% for vincristine, doxorubicin, actinomycin, ifosfamide and etoposide. Negative surgical margins were associated with a 56% survival rate. 5-year overall survival (OS) of 42.5% and event-free survival (EFS) of 39%. Both the OS and EFS were better in patients who had surgery alone as local control (LC). Conclusion: Outcomes in patients who had surgery as LC did better in this study. Early recognition and referral may help in reducing the tumour burden so that good LC with surgical R-zero resection is possible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wali et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Chest wall Ewing sarcoma (n=46). Compressed vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide and etoposide chemotherapy vs. Vincristine, doxorubicin, actinomycin, ifosfamide and etoposide chemotherapy was evaluated on Survival rate. Compressed VDC/IE chemotherapy was associated with a 48% survival rate compared with 38% for VDC/IAE in paediatric patients with chest wall Ewing sarcoma.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: