Key result
Intensive SBP lowering decreased the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with T2DM on standard glycemic control (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.59-0.98), irrespective of baseline DBP.
Why the study?
It was unclear whether low baseline diastolic blood pressure modifies the cardiovascular benefits of intensive systolic blood pressure lowering in type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Does intensive systolic blood pressure lowering reduce cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus irrespective of baseline diastolic blood pressure?
RCT (n=4,731)
two-by-two factorial
Does intensive systolic blood pressure lowering reduce cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus irrespective of baseline diastolic blood pressure?
Intensive SBP lowering to <120 mmHg reduces cardiovascular events in T2DM patients on standard glycemic control, regardless of their baseline diastolic blood pressure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Intensive SBP lowering benefits T2DM patients irrespective of low baseline DBP; extends safety data for <120 mmHg targets in this population.
OBJECTIVE To examine whether low baseline diastolic blood pressure (DBP) modifies the effects of intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) lowering on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Blood Pressure trial (ACCORD BP), a two-by-two factorial randomized controlled trial, examined effects of SBP (<120 vs. <140 mmHg) and glycemic (HbA1c <6% vs. 7.0–7.9% [<42 vs. 53–63 mmol/mol]) control on cardiovascular events in T2DM (N = 4,731). We examined whether effects of SBP control on cardiovascular composite were modified by baseline DBP and glycemic control. RESULTS Intensive SBP lowering decreased the risk of the cardiovascular composite (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76 [95% CI 0.59–0.98]) in the standard glycemic arm but not in the intensive glycemic arm (HR 1.06 [95% CI 0.81–1.40]). Spline regression models relating the effects of the intervention on the cardiovascular composite across the range of baseline DBP did not show evidence of effect modification by low baseline DBP for the cardiovascular composite in the standard or intensive glycemic arms. The relation between the effect of the intensive SBP intervention and baseline DBP was similar between glycemic arms for the cardiovascular composite three-way interaction (P = 0.83). CONCLUSIONS In persons with T2DM, intensive SBP lowering decreased the risk of cardiovascular composite end point irrespective of baseline DBP in the setting of standard glycemic control. Hence, low baseline DBP should not be an impediment to intensive SBP lowering in patients with T2DM treated with guideline-recommended standard glycemic control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ilkun et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=4,731). Intensive systolic blood pressure lowering vs. Standard systolic blood pressure lowering (<140 mmHg) was evaluated on cardiovascular composite (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.59-0.98). Intensive SBP lowering decreased the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with T2DM on standard glycemic control (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.59-0.98), irrespective of baseline DBP.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: