This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide [FeFe] hydrogenases make up a structurally diverse family of metalloenzymes that catalyze proton/dihydrogen interconversion. They can be classified into phylogenetically distinct groups denoted A–G, which differ in structure and reactivity. Prototypical Group A hydrogenases have high turnover rates and remarkable energy efficiency. As compared to Group A enzymes, the putatively sensory Group D hydrogenase from Thermoanaerobacter mathranii ( Tam HydS) has a thousand-fold lower H 2 evolution rate and a high overpotential requirement to drive catalysis (irreversible) but shows increased inhibitor tolerance. This divergence in structure and activity between hydrogenases makes them ideal models for studying second (active-site environment) and outer ( e.g., substrate transport) coordination sphere effects on metal cofactors. Herein, we generated three Tam HydS-based variants, each mimicking proposed key structural features of Group A hydrogenase: the “active site” ( AS ), “proton-transfer pathway” ( PTP ), and “combined” ( CM = AS + PTP ) variant. A fourth single-point variant, A137C, which introduces a proposed critical cysteine in the active site, was characterized as a reference. No change in isolation resulted in Group A-like behavior; i.e ., no positive impact on catalytic performance was observed. The CM variant, however, showed increased H 2 evolution activity but retained the overpotential requirement. Additionally, the CM variant improved the already relatively high stability of Tam HydS against O 2 and CO inhibition. These findings show that activity rates, (ir)reversibility, and susceptibility to gaseous inhibitors are decoupled. Moreover, the results highlight the importance of exploring hydrogenase diversity as a path toward understanding the structural factors that enable the outstanding catalytic properties of [FeFe] hydrogenases.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cabotaje et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: