Why the study?
To investigate the impact of hypertrophic versus power/force resistance training protocols on cardiac autonomic modulation during exercise recovery in trained individuals.
Does a hypertrophic resistance training protocol reduce heart rate variability during exercise recovery compared to a power/force resistance training protocol in healthy trained individuals?
Does a hypertrophic resistance training protocol reduce heart rate variability during exercise recovery compared to a power/force resistance training protocol in healthy trained individuals?
Hypertrophic resistance training induces greater cardiac autonomic stress and reduces heart rate variability during recovery compared to power/force training in healthy individuals.
Pilot RCT links RT protocol to autonomic recovery; larger trials needed to guide training in athletes.
Purpose: This study investigated the impact of two different resistance training (RT) protocols on cardiac autonomic modulation during exercise recovery in trained individuals. It was hypothesized that a hypertrophic resistance training program would induce more significant stress and negatively affect cardiac autonomic modulation compared to a power/force resistance training program. Methods: Six healthy, trained participants (aged 18–40) were randomized in a crossover and controlled pilot study. Participants performed two RT protocols: (i) three sets of 10 repetitions with 85% of 10 RM, 60 s inter-set rest (3x1060s) and (ii) eight sets of three repetitions with 85% of 3 RM, 120 s inter-set rest (8x3120s). Heart rate variability (HRV) was measured before and 30 min after each RT session. Results: Significant reductions in HRV parameters (RMSSD, HF, and SD1) were observed following the 3x1060s protocol (hypertrophic design) compared to baseline. Conversely, the 8x3120s (power/force design) protocol did not show significant changes in HRV parameters. A significant interaction effect for time and RT protocol was found for all HRV measures with more significant reductions observed after 3x1060s compared to 8x3120s. Conclusions: The hypertrophic RT session (3x1060s) significantly reduced HRV parameters, suggesting higher physiological stress and potentially negative implications for cardiac autonomic recovery than the power/force RT session (8x3120s). These findings highlight the importance of considering exercise intensity and protocol design to manage cardiac autonomic stress during resistance training.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gobbo et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: