Why the study?
What is the role of calcium channel blockers and other antihypertensive therapies in the treatment of women with preeclampsia?
What is the role of calcium channel blockers and other antihypertensive therapies in the treatment of women with preeclampsia?
This review discusses the historical context and evolving role of antihypertensive therapies, including calcium channel blockers, in managing preeclampsia.
Review summarizes evolving antihypertensives in preeclampsia; leaves open optimal calcium channel blocker guidance pending new trials.
Preeclampsia was originally known as a process whereby an unknown “toxin” was responsible for a variety of responses. While this toxin has yet to be determined, many theories have prevailed as to the appropriate therapy for this condition. Recently, antihypertensive therapy has become increasingly regarded as an important component of the medical management of women with preeclampsia. Initially, the ideal therapy for peripartum acute hypertensive emergencies was felt to be a smooth muscle relaxant and the most commonly prescribed agent was hydralazine. This drug was felt to be beneficial because of its action on vascular smooth muscle, decreasing vasospasm. Outside of the United States diazoxide was also used for this purpose, although this drug has been replaced because of the high incidence of fetal distress. Another agent that was frequently used was α-methyldopa which was initially considered to be the treatment of choice in the treatment of patieats with moderate and severe preeclampsia. Recently, α-methyldopa has been reserved for the outpatient management of gestational hypertension, especially in women with mild preeclampsia or chronic hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lewis et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: