Why the study?
Does a comprehensive community-based intervention improve pharmacological treatment rates in adults with metabolic syndrome?
Does a comprehensive community-based intervention improve pharmacological treatment rates in adults with metabolic syndrome?
A comprehensive community-based intervention significantly increased the use of evidence-based pharmacological therapies, such as statins and antihypertensives, among individuals with metabolic syndrome.
Community interventions may improve treatment rates in metabolic syndrome; cross-sectional data leave open confirmation in randomized trials.
INTRODUCTION: Pharmacological therapy is a crucial step in the management of individuals with the metabolic syndrome, when lifestyle modifications alone cannot achieve the therapeutic goals. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of comprehensive interventions with the pharmacological treatment in individuals with the metabolic syndrome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional population-based survey examined a sample of adults before and after conducting a community trial. Physical examination and blood sampling, data regarding the demographic characteristics, medical status and history of medication use were obtained. Pharmacologic treatment related to metabolic syndrome's components was also determined. RESULTS: The most common pharmacologic agents consumed by individuals with metabolic syndrome were β-blockers (26.1% and 30.4% in 2001 and 2007, respectively), followed by lipid-lowering agents (5.4% and 14% in 2001 and 2007, respectively), with significant differences before and after intervention. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was higher in women than in men both before (36.4% vs. 14%) and after the community trial (26.1% vs. 16%, respectively) in the intervention areas (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found a significant increase in medication use to control blood pressure and dyslipidemia among the individuals with the metabolic syndrome, notably in the intervention areas. In addition to the population approach, the high-risk approach should be considered in community trials for prevention and control of non-communicable diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gharipour et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: