Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Population
415 stroke cases and 415 matched non-stroke controls from 2888 Shanghai community-aged residents
Comparison
Blood pressure indicators in stroke cases vs matched non-stroke controls
Design
Community-based nested case-control study
Multiple BP indicators linked to stroke in elderly; leaves open optimal targets for prevention.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Any single discrete blood pressure (BP) measurement is not enough to estimate adverse cardiovascular events. We aim to comprehensively investigate the association between BP indicators and stroke. METHODS: An observational cohort study was conducted among 2888 Shanghai community-aged residents from 2014 to 2018, and a nested case-control study was designed to identify the association between BP indicators and stroke. In total 415 cases of stroke detected during the study period were selected as the case group and 415 non-stroke subjects, matched with factors of age and gender, were randomly selected from the cohort as control group. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that systolic blood pressure (SBP) (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.03), pulse pressure (PP) (AOR 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.04), mean arterial pressure (MAP) (AOR1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.04) and pulse pressure index (PPI) (AOR 25.68, 95% CI 3.19-206.90) increased the risk of stroke, respectively. After fitting both BP indicators and covariates, isolated abnormal SBP (AOR 2.55, 95% CI 1.74-3.72) or PP ≥50 mmHg (AOR 1.66, 95% CI 1.08-2.56) independently increased risk of stroke. CONCLUSION: Besides SBP, PP and multiple factors, assessment should be taken into account comprehensively for stroke prevention and management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ren et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: