Why the study?
A persistent knowledge gap remains regarding optimal risk stratification and management in female CHD patients, driven by limited awareness, lack of sex-specific guideline thresholds, and underperforming diagnostic approaches.
This systematic review emphasizes the critical need for sex-specific approaches in the prevention, diagnosis, and management of cardiovascular disease in women to address persistent knowledge gaps and worsening outcomes.
Persistent gaps in female CHD risk stratification warrant caution in current practice; confirms need for sex-specific thresholds in guidelines and trials.
Although substantial progress has been made toward improving gender- and sex-specific cardiovascular disease (CVD) management and outcomes, contemporary reports indicate a persistent knowledge gap with regard to optimal risk-stratification and management in female cardiac heart disease (CHD) patients. Prominent patient and system delays in diagnosing CHD are, in part, due to the limited awareness for the latent CVD risk in women, a lack of sex-specific thresholds within clinical guidelines, and subsequent limited performance of contemporary diagnostic approaches in women. Several traditional risk factors for CHD affect both women and men. But other factors can play a bigger role in the development of heart disease in women. In addition, little is known about the influence of socioenvironmental and contextual factors on gender-specific disease manifestation and outcomes. It is imperative that we understand the mechanisms that contribute to worsening risk factors profiles in young women to reduce future atherosclerotic CVD morbidity and mortality. This comprehensive review focuses on the novel aspects of cardiovascular health in women and sex differences as they relate to clinical practice and prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of CVD. Increased recognition of the prevalence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors and their differential impact in women, as well as emerging nontraditional risk factors unique to or more common in women, contribute to new understanding mechanisms, leading to worsening outcome for women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sozzi et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: