Why the study?
Do P wave dispersion and left atrial appendage function predict recurrence of atrial fibrillation after successful cardioversion?
Do P wave dispersion and left atrial appendage function predict recurrence of atrial fibrillation after successful cardioversion?
Increased P wave dispersion, dilated left atrium, and depressed LAA emptying flow are strong independent predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence after successful cardioversion.
May aid post-cardioversion AF recurrence risk stratification; hypothesis-generating in Level 3 data, needs prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: We investigated P wave dispersion and left atrial appendage (LAA) function for predicting atrial fibrillation (AF) relapse, and the relationship between P wave dispersion and LAA function. METHODS: Sixty-four consecutive patients with AF lasting </=3 months were evaluated to predict the recurrence after successful cardioversion. P wave duration and dispersion were measured in a 12-lead electrocardiograph (ECG). The size and function of the left atrium (LA) and LAA were assessed by transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. RESULTS: After 6 months, 28 patients experienced recurrent AF and 36 remained in sinus rhythm. There was no difference between patients with and without recurrence in gender, age, underlying heart disease, AF patterns, left ventricular function, and maximum LAA area. AF duration >/=5 days, LA size >/=45 mm, maximum P wave duration >/=112 ms, P wave dispersion >/=47 ms, spontaneous echo contrast, minimum LAA area >/=166 mm(2), and LAA emptying velocity <36 cm/sec were univariate predictors of recurrence (each P < 0.05). By multivariate analysis, LA size (P = 0.02), P wave dispersion (P < 0.001), and LAA emptying flow (P = 0.01) identified patients with recurrent AF. Their positive predictive values were 91, 97, and 72%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The increased P wave dispersion in addition to the dilated LA and the depressed LAA emptying flow can identify patients at risk of recurrent AF after cardioversion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doğan et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: