Randomized trial reveals a decrease in vegetable waste in Chilean households, suggesting effective intervention strategies.
Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and direct measurement of waste are the gold standards for evaluating food waste interventions. This pilot RCT explored the effects of a 3-week tailored informational–enablement intervention to reduce the causes and amount of fruit and vegetable waste in households in Santiago, Chile. Households were randomized to intervention (n = 23) or control (n = 23). Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, fruit and vegetable consumption, and perceived causes of waste were assessed by questionnaire. Avoidable waste was quantified by direct weighing at baseline, post-intervention, and observational follow-up. At baseline, median (25th–75th percentiles) avoidable waste was 153 (128–180) (g/day per person for fruits and 102 (95–124) for vegetables. Purchase was the most frequently reported cause of waste. At post-intervention, the change in vegetable waste (Δwaste) was lower in the intervention vs. the control group (−6 (−9, −3) vs. 3 (−5, 10) g/day per person; p = 0.0129), without difference for fruits (p = 0.0895). Observational follow-up showed decreases in avoidable fruit and vegetable waste from post-intervention to month 6 (p < 0.001) and to month 9 (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the tailored informational–enablement intervention reduced avoidable vegetable waste in the studied Chilean households. Follow-up measurements could contribute to capturing longer-term changes in fruit and vegetable waste.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fredes et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: