Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Risk mitigation strategies have an environmental effect besides their economic benefits. The current research investigates designing a green-resilient supply chain network under the risk of disruptions. A new risk mitigation strategy namely “coalition” is applied between suppliers in a bi-objective mixed-integer linear programming model to minimize total cost and carbon emissions, simultaneously. Along with the coalition strategy between suppliers, the multi-sourcing strategy in the downstream supply chain is applied for retailers. The performance of the coalition strategy is compared with the three reputable risk mitigation strategies in both single-source and multi-source retailers. Results revealed that the average total cost and total carbon emissions of the green-resilient model have been reduced by 14% and 3.6% compared to the non-resilient model, respectively. Besides, multiple-sourcing for retailers has no improvement in the non-resilient model. On the contrary, the economic and environmental performance of the resilient model varies for the different number of sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yavari et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: