Repetitive nerve stimulation (5/second) was done at the median nerve at the wrist and at the accessory nerve just behind the sternocleidomastoid muscle before and 20 seconds to 5 minutes after tetanic nerve stimulation (1 minute). Since the degree of the neuromuscular block depends on the body temperature these investigations were done successively at skin temperatures of 32 degrees C and 36 degrees C. A comparison of the results obtained revealed the highest rate of pathologic decrement with posttetanic accessory nerve stimulation (32 degrees C = 77%, 36 degrees C = 87%), whereas with posttetanic median nerve stimulation pathological results were obtained in a significantly lower proportion (32 degrees C = 50%, 36 degrees C = 60%). The advantages of the stimulation of the accessory nerve for the detection of partial neuromuscular block are: 1. The superficially located accessory nerve allows for supramaximal stimulation with rather low stimulus intensities (6-20 mA). 2. Since the accessory nerve is mainly a motor nerve, the stimulation is less painful than the stimulation of a mixed nerve. 3. Stimulation of a proximal nerve is more sensitive for detecting a defect in neuromuscular transmission than stimulation of a distal nerve. 4. There is no risk of a pneumothorax and of a traumatic nerve lesion as there is with stimulation of the brachial plexus by needle electrodes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schumm et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: