Why the study?
Does baseline chronic kidney disease increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmias requiring device therapy in patients with heart failure receiving primary prevention CRT-D?
Does baseline chronic kidney disease increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmias requiring device therapy in patients with heart failure receiving primary prevention CRT-D?
Baseline chronic kidney disease is a strong independent predictor of sustained ventricular arrhythmias requiring device therapy in patients with heart failure receiving primary prevention CRT-D.
BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a risk factor for arrhythmias in patients with heart failure (HF). However, the effects of CKD on ventricular arrhythmia (VA) burden in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy and defibrillator (CRT-D) devices in a primary prevention setting are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether baseline CKD is associated with increased risk of VA in patients implanted with primary prevention CRT-D devices. METHODS AND RESULTS: ) (CKD group). CKD group patients were significantly older (70.0 ± 10 years vs. 61.3 ± 12 years, P < 0.05) with higher prevalence of ischemic cardiomyopathy (56.2% vs. 40.2%, P < 0.05). Detected ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) episodes resulting in device therapy occurred significantly more frequently in the CKD group [40/106(37.8%)] than controls [24/93(25.8%)], (odd ratio [OR] = 1.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01-3.2, P = 0.05). At 5-year follow-up, interval censored data analysis showed 41% VT/VF incidence in the CKD group compared to 24% incidence in controls (P < 0.05). Cox proportional hazards model identified CKD > III as the only predictor of sustained VA in this group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.92, CI = 1.39-6.1, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Baseline CKD is a strong independent risk factor for VA in primary prevention CRT-D recipients. Further understanding of the underlying arrhythmogenic mechanisms relating to CKD may be of interest to allow appropriate correction and prevention. Device programming in this cohort may need to reflect this increased risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Babu et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: