Key result
Bridge-to-bridge ECLS achieves comparable long-term survival to first-line LTMCS, with ~52% surviving at 30 months.
Observational (n=97)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) devices provide temporary mechanical circulatory assistance and are usually implanted under emergency conditions in critical patients. If weaning off ECLS is not possible, heart transplantation or implantation of long-term mechanical circulatory support (LTMCS) is required. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the bridge-to-bridge (BTB) concept. METHODS: Between 1 January 2004 and 1 August 2010, 97 patients were assisted by LTMCS. The implantation was the first-line intervention in 48 patients (the bridge group), and was performed after a period of ECLS support in 49 others (the BTB group). RESULTS: The long-term survival rate was 51.6%, with a mean follow-up of 30.7 months, and there were no differences for biological parameters between the two groups. Patients in the BTB group whose condition was initially more severe, improved under ECLS support, and those in whom biological parameters did not revert to normal died after LTMCS. Risk factors for mortality in the BTB group were total bilirubin and lactate before LTMCS, and alkaline phosphatase before ECLS support. CONCLUSIONS: The BTB concept allows the implementation of LTMCS in severe patients, for whom it was not originally envisaged, with the same long-term survival as in first-line settings. ECLS in the evolution of patients is predictive of survival after LTMCS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lebreton et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Critical cardiac failure requiring long-term mechanical circulatory support (LTMCS) (n=97). Bridge-to-bridge (BTB) strategy (ECLS prior to LTMCS) vs. First-line LTMCS implantation (bridge group) was evaluated on Long-term survival. Bridge-to-bridge ECLS before LTMCS achieved comparable long-term survival to first-line LTMCS.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: