Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety of the new atypical antipsychotic drug, amisulpride, in short- and long-term use. METHOD: Studies comparing the safety of amisulpride with that of haloperidol and risperidone, respectively, are reviewed. Safety was monitored by open adverse event reporting, the Simpson-Angus Scale, the Barnes Akathisia Scale and the Abnormal Involuntary Movement scale. RESULTS: In short- and long-term studies, amisulpride induced significantly less EPS and akathisia than haloperidol. Safety ratings were similar to risperidone in short-term studies. In studies of chronic schizophrenia with predominant negative symptoms, amisulpride was similar to placebo. Endocrine effects were similar in amisulpride-, haloperidol- and risperidone-treated patients. Weight gain with amisulpride was significantly less than risperidone in a short-term study. No clinically important effects on haematological, hepatic or cardiac function were recorded. Data obtained in short- and long-term studies have been confirmed in extensive post-marketing surveillance data. CONCLUSION: Amisulpride has a broad spectrum of efficacy in schizophrenia without introducing the iatrogenic consequences associated with older therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rein et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: