Why the study?
Does pulmonary vein antrum isolation increase esophageal acid levels in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation?
Does pulmonary vein antrum isolation increase esophageal acid levels in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation?
Pulmonary vein antrum isolation does not increase esophageal acid levels, refuting the hypothesis that right vagal nerve stimulation during the procedure causes acidic gastro-esophageal reflux.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PVAI was associated with reduced esophageal acid exposure; challenges vagal reflux hypothesis but leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) is a potentially curative, nonpharmacologic treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Several procedural complications have been described, including esophageal wall lesions ranging from erythema and esophagitis, necrosis and ulcer, to atrio-esophageal fistula. We prospectively studied changes in esophageal acid levels before and after PVAI. METHODS: We performed 24-hour pH-metry before and 1.3 +/- 1.6 days after PVAI, in 25 patients (mean age = 62 +/- 12 years, 17 men) with symptomatic AF. A 2-mm transnasal probe was inserted into the inferior part of the esophagus and into the stomach to measure pH levels at fixed intervals. DeMeester scores, indicating acidic gastro-esophageal reflux, were calculated. RESULTS: The mean number of reflux episodes increased from 89 +/- 80 before to 107 +/- 94 after PVAI. The mean percentage of time with esophageal pH < 4 was shorter after (108 +/- 193 minutes) than before PVAI (159 +/- 245 minutes). The mean DeMeester score decreased from 49 +/- 68 before to 31 +/- 41 after PVAI (P < 0.05). We observed erythema or esophagitis in five patients, necrosis or ulcer in seven, and atrio-esophageal fistula in no patient. CONCLUSIONS: Our hypothesis of increased acid levels caused by stimulation of the right vagal nerve during isolation of the right upper pulmonary vein was not verified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nölker et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: