Key result
Esophageal tissue injury occurred in 2% of patients following pulmonary vein isolation using the PVAC; MRI proved unreliable for screening due to false positive and negative findings.
Why the study?
Does MRI reliably detect esophageal tissue injury compared to endoscopy following pulmonary vein isolation using PVAC in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=41)
Does MRI reliably detect esophageal tissue injury compared to endoscopy following pulmonary vein isolation using PVAC in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation?
MRI is not a reliable screening method for detecting esophageal tissue injury following PVAC ablation due to false positive and false negative findings compared to endoscopy.
MRI should not replace endoscopy for post-PVAC esophageal injury detection; leaves open need for reliable non-invasive alternatives.
BACKGROUND: We investigate the frequency of esophageal tissue injury (ETI) following ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) using the pulmonary vein ablation catheter (PVAC) ascertained by esophageal endoscopy (ESE) and corresponding magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: A total of 41 patients with symptomatic AF presenting for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) were included consecutively in two observational groups. Group A received MRI the day before and ESE plus MRI within 3-4 weeks following the ablation procedure using the PVAC. Group B received MRI the day before and ESE plus MRI within 2 days after PVI. MRI included T2-weighted and T1-weighted postcontrast with fat suppression (fs) and late-enhancement scans to demonstrate postprocedural edema and contrast enhancement of the esophageal wall. RESULTS: A total of 13 (32%) patients were enrolled in Group A (26 ± 11 days post-PVI), and 28 (68%) patients in Group B (2 ± 0.6 days post-PVI). ETI was found by ESE in one (2%) patient (Group B) and resolved under conservative therapy. Corresponding MRI showed a false negative result with no alterations of esophageal structures using T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and late enhancement scans. In addition, false positive results were demonstrated by late-enhancement MRI in five (12%) patients (three patients in Group A and two patients in Group B), which could not be verified by corresponding ESE. CONCLUSIONS: Endoluminal ETI is a rare but possible complication, which should be considered following PVAC procedures. MRI of the esophagus is currently not a reliable screening method due to false positive and negative findings compared to ESE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bary et al. (2013) conducted an observational in symptomatic atrial fibrillation (n=41). Pulmonary vein isolation using the pulmonary vein ablation catheter (PVAC) was evaluated on Esophageal tissue injury (ETI) ascertained by esophageal endoscopy (ESE). Esophageal tissue injury occurred in 2% of patients following pulmonary vein isolation using the PVAC; MRI proved unreliable for screening due to false positive and negative findings.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: