Why the study?
Protection of vulnerable populations against circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2 outbreaks could be facilitated by shorter intervals between the two recommended nOPV2 doses.
Does administering two doses of novel oral poliovirus vaccine type 2 (nOPV2) at shorter intervals (1-week or 2-week) achieve non-inferior type 2 poliovirus seroconversion rates at 28 days after the second dose compared with the standard 4-week interval in healthy infants aged 6-8 weeks?
Does administering two doses of novel oral poliovirus vaccine type 2 (nOPV2) at shorter intervals (1-week or 2-week) achieve non-inferior type 2 poliovirus seroconversion rates at 28 days after the second dose compared with the standard 4-week interval in healthy infants aged 6-8 weeks?
Two doses of nOPV2 administered at a 2-week interval are safe and non-inferior in immunogenicity to the standard 4-week interval in infants, and both 1-week and 2-week schedules achieve >95% seroprotection, supporting flexible shorter-interval vaccination campaigns during poliovirus outbreaks.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shorter nOPV2 intervals are safe and immunogenic in infants; extends campaign flexibility for cVDPV2 outbreaks while confirming 2-week non-inferiority.
BACKGROUND: The novel oral poliovirus vaccine type 2 (nOPV2) is now authorised by a WHO emergency use listing and widely distributed to interrupt outbreaks of circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2. As protection of vulnerable populations, particularly young infants, could be facilitated by shorter intervals between the two recommended doses, we aimed to assess safety and non-inferiority of immunogenicity of nOPV2 in 1-week, 2-week, and 4-week schedules. METHODS: 50% cell culture infective dose. Neutralising antibodies against poliovirus types 1, 2, and 3 were measured before each immunisation and 4 weeks after the second dose. The primary outcome was the type 2 seroconversion rate 28 days after the second dose, and the non-inferiority margin was defined as a lower bound 95% CI of greater than -10%. Safety and reactogenicity were assessed through diary cards completed by the parent or guardian. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05033561. FINDINGS: We enrolled 905 infants between Dec 16, 2021, and March 28, 2022. 872 infants were included in the per-protocol analyses: 289 in group A, 293 in group B, and 290 in group C. Type 2 seroconversion rates were 87·5% (95% CI 83·2 to 91·1) in group A (253 of 289 participants), 91·8% (88·1 to 94·7) in group B (269 of 293 participants), and 95·5% (92·5 to 97·6) in group C (277 of 290 participants). Non-inferiority was shown for group B compared with group C (difference in rates -3·7; 95% CI -7·9 to 0·3), but not for group A compared with group C (-8·0; -12·7 to -3·6). 4 weeks after the second nOPV2 dose, type 2 neutralising antibodies increased in all three groups such that over 95% of each group was seroprotected against polio type 2, although final geometric mean titres tended to be highest with longer intervals between doses. Immunisation with nOPV2 was well tolerated with no causal association to vaccination of any severe or serious adverse event; one death from septic shock during the study was unrelated to the vaccine. INTERPRETATION: Two nOPV2 doses administered 1 week or 2 weeks apart from age 6 weeks to 8 weeks were safe and immunogenic. Immune responses after a 2-week interval were non-inferior to those after the standard 4-week interval, but marked responses after a 1-week interval suggest that schedules with an over 1-week interval can be used to provide flexibility to campaigns to improve coverage and hasten protection during circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2 outbreaks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mejía et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: