Why the study?
Do the HRindex and HRratio equations accurately predict VO2max in white and black men compared to maximal treadmill exercise testing?
Do the HRindex and HRratio equations accurately predict VO2max in white and black men compared to maximal treadmill exercise testing?
Heart rate-based equations for predicting VO2max may be valid for estimating group means in white men but overestimate values in black men and have too much error for individual predictions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
These equations should not guide individual VO2max estimates in men; leaves open need for validated, race-specific alternatives.
Esco, MR, Olson, MS, Williford, HN, Mugu, EM, Bloomquist, BE, and McHugh, AN. Crossvalidation of two heart rate-based equations for predicting V[Combining Dot Above]O2max in white and black men. J Strength Cond Res 26(7): 1920–1927, 2012—The purpose of this investigation was to crossvalidate 2 equations that use the ratio of maximal heart rate (HRmax) to resting HR (HRrest) for predicting maximal oxygen consumption (V[Combining Dot Above]O2max) in white and black men. One hundred and nine white (n = 51) and black (n = 58) men completed a maximal exercise test on a treadmill to determine V[Combining Dot Above]O2max. The HRrest and HRmax were used to predict V[Combining Dot Above]O2max via the HRindex and HRratio equations. Validity statistics were done to compare the criterion versus predicted V[Combining Dot Above]O2max values across the entire cohort and within each race separately. For the entire group, V[Combining Dot Above]O2max was significantly overestimated with the HRindex equation, but the HRratio equation yielded no significant difference compared with the criterion. In addition, there were no significant differences shown between V[Combining Dot Above]O2max and either HR-based prediction equation for the white subgroup. However, both equations significantly overestimated V[Combining Dot Above]O2max in the black group. Furthermore, large standard error of estimates (ranging from 6.92 to 7.90 ml·kg−1·min−1), total errors (ranging from 8.30 to 8.62 ml·kg−1·min−1), and limits of agreement (ranging from upper limits of 16.65 to lower limits of −18.25 ml·kg−1·min−1) were revealed when comparing the predicted to criterion V[Combining Dot Above]O2max for both the groups. Considering the results of this investigation, the HRratio and HRindex methods appear to crossvalidate and prove useful for estimating the mean V[Combining Dot Above]O2max in white men as a group but not for an age-matched group of black men. However, because of inflated values for error, caution should be exercised when using these methods to predict individual V[Combining Dot Above]O2max.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Esco et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: