Why the study?
Does a 6-month aerobic exercise intervention improve arterial stiffness in older adults with Type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia?
Does a 6-month aerobic exercise intervention improve arterial stiffness in older adults with Type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia?
In older adults with multiple cardiovascular risk factors, short-term improvements in arterial stiffness from aerobic training are not sustained over 6 months despite maintained aerobic fitness.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Finite aerobic training yields only transient PWV reductions in older adults with multiple risk factors; challenges durability of vascular benefits from time-limited programs.
There is a well-established relationship between increased arterial stiffness and cardiovascular mortality. We examined whether a long-term aerobic exercise intervention (6 months) would increase arterial compliance in older adults with hypertension complicated by Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and hyperlipidemia. A total of 52 older adults (mean age 69.3±0.6 years, 30 males and 22 females) with diet/oral hypoglycemic-controlled T2DM, hypertension and hypercholesterolemia were recruited. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of two groups: an aerobic group (6 months vigorous aerobic exercise, AT group) and a non-aerobic group (6 months of no aerobic exercise, NA group). Arterial stiffness was measured as pulse-wave velocity (PWV) using the Complior device. Aerobic training decreased arterial stiffness as measured by both radial (P=0.001, 2-way analysis of variance with repeated measures) and femoral (P=0.002) PWV. This was due to a decrease in arterial stiffness in the AT group after 3 months of training, which was not maintained after 6-month training for either radial (P=0.707) or femoral (P=0.680) PWV. Our findings indicate that in older adults with multiple cardiovascular risk factors, short-term improvements in arterial stiffness became attenuated over the long term.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Madden et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: