Why the study?
Continuity of hip fracture rehabilitation is frequently interrupted during transitions between sectors, compromising recovery and motivating the development of an optimized cross-sectoral program.
Does an optimized cross-sectoral rehabilitation program improve recovery and patient satisfaction in citizens ≥65 years old after acute hip fracture surgery?
Does an optimized cross-sectoral rehabilitation program improve recovery and patient satisfaction in citizens ≥65 years old after acute hip fracture surgery?
An optimized cross-sectoral rehabilitation program developed using theoretical frameworks like BCW and RE-AIM improved patient satisfaction and physical function after hip fracture surgery.
Interrupted cross-sectoral rehab after hip fracture may compromise recovery; leaves open whether integrated programs improve outcomes.
Fall-related hip fracture (HF) is a frequent trauma in Scandinavia with a yearly incidence of 8,000 among ≥65-year-old citizens in Denmark. The rising incidence and global predictions are alarming since a HF is a major, and potentially fatal, trauma to the citizen, requiring acute surgery, a multimodal approach and post-operative crosssectoral rehabilitation. However, continuity of the rehabilitation program is frequently interrupted in the transition between sectors, compromising optimal recovery of frail citizens. Thus, there is a need to develop and implement optimized cross-sectoral rehabilitation after HF. The purpose of this explorative study was to develop, implement and evaluate an optimized cross-sectoral rehabilitation program (OCRP) after HF surgery using validated theoretical frameworks. OCRP was developed, implemented and evaluated in one municipality using a pragmatic user-centered approach, quantitative and qualitative data collection and theoretical frameworks including the Behavior Change Wheel (BCW) and RE-AIM. Results of OCRP showed optimized rehabilitation based on motivated health professionals, high patient satisfaction and tendencies of improved levels of physical function. No re-referrals to rehabilitation were reported after OCRP. The BCW, RE-AIM and user-centered approach to program development, implementation and evaluation are useful to apply in program development and evaluation processes across sectors, professions, and medical specialties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poulsen et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: