This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Patients with ulcerative colitis who fail biological therapy represent a challenging population with limited comparative evidence to guide the sequencing of advanced treatments. The present network meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of biologics and small molecules for the induction and maintenance of remission in biological-exposed ulcerative colitis. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus enrolling adults with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis and prior exposure or failure to biologicals from inception to March 2025. Outcomes included induction and maintenance of clinical remission. Frequentist and Bayesian random-effects models were applied, and comparative efficacy was ranked using surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values. Twenty-one RCTs (n = 5417 induction; n = 3076 maintenance) were included. For induction, most advanced therapies outperformed placebo, though adalimumab, vedolizumab, ozanimod, and mirikizumab did not reach statistical significance. Upadacitinib ranked highest for induction (SUCRA: 89.3), followed by tofacitinib (88.5) and ustekinumab (77.5). For maintenance, all evaluated agents were superior to placebo. Upadacitinib ranked highest (SUCRA: 85.9), followed by vedolizumab (73.6) and etrasimod (71.8). Subgroup analysis of re-randomized studies confirmed the superiority of upadacitinib and vedolizumab. Certainty of evidence was generally low due to imprecision and publication bias. In biologic-experienced ulcerative colitis, upadacitinib demonstrated the highest efficacy for both induction and maintenance of remission, with tofacitinib and ustekinumab effective alternatives for induction, and vedolizumab a strong option for long-term maintenance. Further head-to-head trials in biologic-experienced populations are warranted.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giri et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: