Why the study?
IE management is challenging during COVID-19 lockdown due to reliance on echocardiography and associated viral transmission risks, prompting evaluation of an endocarditis team to limit routine echocardiography and its effect on outcomes.
Does limiting routine echocardiography through an endocarditis team approach affect diagnostic ability or mortality in patients with suspected infective endocarditis during a pandemic lockdown?
Does limiting routine echocardiography through an endocarditis team approach affect diagnostic ability or mortality in patients with suspected infective endocarditis during a pandemic lockdown?
A multidisciplinary endocarditis team can safely limit the use of transoesophageal echocardiography in suspected infective endocarditis without compromising diagnostic sensitivity or increasing mortality.
ET-guided restriction of echocardiography in suspected IE showed no mortality increase; leaves open prospective validation before broader adoption.
Background. Infective endocarditis (IE) is challenging to manage in the COVID-19 lockdown period, in part given its reliance on echocardiography for diagnosis and management and the associated virus transmission risks to patients and healthcare workers. This study assesses utilisation of the endocarditis team (ET) in limiting routine echocardiography, especially transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE), in patients with suspected IE, and explores the effect on clinical outcomes. Methods. All patients discussed at the ET meeting at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust during the first lockdown in the UK (23 March to 8 July 2020) were prospectively included and analysed in this observational study. Results. In total, 38 patients were referred for ET review (71% male, median age 54 [interquartile range 48, 65.5] years). At the time of ET discussion, 21% had no echo imaging, 16% had point-of-care ultrasound only, and 63% had formal TTE. In total, only 16% underwent TOE. The ability of echocardiography, in those where it was performed, to affect IE diagnosis according to the Modified Duke Criteria was significant ( <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1"> <a:mi>p</a:mi> <a:mo>=</a:mo> <a:mn>0.0099</a:mn> </a:math> ); however, sensitivity was not affected. All-cause mortality was 17% at 30 days and 25% at 12 months from ET discussion in those with confirmed IE. Conclusion. Limiting echocardiography in patients with a low pretest probability (not probable or definite IE according to the Modified Duke Criteria) did not affect the diagnostic ability of the Modified Duke Criteria to rule out IE in this small study. Moreover, restricting nonessential echocardiography, and importantly TOE, in patients with suspected IE through use of the ET did not impact all-cause mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hartley et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: