Key result
Resistance training boosts myocardial angiogenic and metabolic gene expression compared to sedentary controls.
Why the study?
The myocardial transcriptional responses to acute and chronic resistance training remain incompletely understood.
Does acute or chronic resistance training modulate myocardial angiogenesis-related gene expression in healthy Wistar rats?
Does acute or chronic resistance training modulate myocardial angiogenesis-related gene expression in healthy Wistar rats?
Mean Difference: 0.375 (95% CI 0.0986–0.6514)
p-value: p=<0.01
Acute and chronic resistance training induce distinct myocardial transcriptional profiles in healthy rats, with chronic training specifically enhancing metabolic and angiogenic signaling via PGC-1α and VEGF.
Resistance training alters myocardial gene expression in rats; hypothesis-generating for human adaptations, no clinical implications yet.
Myocardial angiogenesis contributes to the maintenance of myocardial perfusion and cardiac function. Resistance training (RT) induces cardiovascular adaptations, but the myocardial transcriptional responses to acute RT (ART) and chronic RT (CRT) remain incompletely understood. This study compared the expression of angiogenesis‐ and metabolic adaptation–related genes in the left ventricle following a single RT bout and 8 weeks of repeated RT in healthy male Wistar rats. Twenty‐four rats were randomized to three groups: sedentary control (CON) ( n = 8), ART (one ladder‐climbing session), or CRT (ladder‐climbing 5 days/week for 8 weeks). RT was performed on a 1‐m ladder inclined at 80° using progressive loads attached to the tail. Left‐ventricular tissue was collected 1 h after the exercise bout in ART and 1 h after the final training session in CRT. Compared to CON, ART showed significantly higher HIF‐1 α and FSTL1 expression, whereas PGC‐1 α and VEGF did not differ significantly. CRT also showed significantly higher HIF‐1 α and FSTL1 expression than CON, together with significantly higher PGC‐1 α and VEGF expression. No significant differences were observed between ART and CRT for any of the genes examined. These findings demonstrate distinct myocardial transcriptional profiles following ART versus CRT, characterized by an HIF‐1α‐ and FSTL1‐associated response after a single bout and a PGC‐1α‐ and VEGF‐associated response following CRT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karisa et al. (2026) studied Healthy Wistar rats (n=24). Resistance Training (Acute or Chronic) vs. Sedentary control was evaluated on Myocardial HIF-1α mRNA expression (ART vs CON) (MD 0.375, 95% CI 0.0986-0.6514, p=<0.01). Acute and chronic resistance training significantly increased myocardial HIF-1α and FSTL1 expression, while chronic training additionally increased PGC-1α and VEGF expression compared to sedentary controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: