Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The analysis of the legislation of the Republic of Moldova demonstrates that the act of cyberflashing involves characteristics that are not necessarily present in the case of the acts provided for by the relevant criminal and contraventional norms in force. This denotes the presence of a lacuna in the legislation of the Republic of Moldova. Cyber flashing violates the right provided by art. 28 of the Constitution of the Republic of Moldova and art. 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, under the aspect of protection against the violation of personal space. However, this act involves sending unsolicited information of a sexual nature to the victim, which penetrates her / his private sphere without her / his consent. It is opportune to establish liability for cyberflashing in the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stati et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: