Why the study?
Does the extent of cardiac muscle cell disorganization differ between patients with apical symmetric hypertrophy and those with asymmetric septal hypertrophy?
Does the extent of cardiac muscle cell disorganization differ between patients with apical symmetric hypertrophy and those with asymmetric septal hypertrophy?
Apical symmetric hypertrophy lacks the significant cardiac muscle cell disorganization characteristic of typical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, supporting its classification as a distinct clinical and histological entity.
Apical symmetric hypertrophy may warrant distinct classification from ASH; supports histological differentiation but leaves open prospective validation.
Apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy has been divided into two entities: apical asymmetric septal hypertrophy (apical ASH) and apical symmetric hypertrophy (AH). The latter differs clinically from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) with ASH, and it is unclear whether AH represents a distinct subtype of HCM. In the present study, the presence or absence and the extent of cardiac muscle cell disorganization, a histologic characteristic of HCM, were compared in patients with AH (n = 10) and ASH (n = 29) in whom cardiac biopsy specimens were obtained from the left ventricular apex and interventricular septum. Disorganization was graded as (1+) in only 1 patient in the AH group and (-) in the remaining 9. In contrast, in the ASH group disorganization was graded as (1+) in 15 patients, (2+) in 7, (3+) in 3, and (-) in only 4 (P < 0.0001). Thus, it was observed that in AH disorganization is virtually absent or at most limited to a very narrow area. It is concluded from a histological stand point as well that the type of apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy showing apical symmetric hypertrophy differs from usual HCM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morimoto et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: