Why the study?
How should venous thromboembolic disease be managed and investigated in the context of cancer?
How should venous thromboembolic disease be managed and investigated in the context of cancer?
This review highlights the strong association between VTE and cancer, recommending LMWH for treatment and considering occult cancer screening in idiopathic VTE.
Supports LMWH for cancer-associated VTE and occult cancer screening in idiopathic cases; leaves open prospective validation before changing practice.
Venous thromboembolic disease is a common cause of mortality and morbidity in patients with cancer. Patients have a 5-6-fold increase in the risk for a venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared with the general population, increasing to 6-7-fold for some cancers. Prophylaxis for VTE should be considered whenever additional risk factors intervene. About 10% of patients with an idiopathic VTE will harbour an occult cancer. Half of these can probably be detected after a focused history, examination, routine blood tests and a chest x ray. The remaining cases may be diagnosed with an intensive screening protocol. About 60% of patients diagnosed on screening will have early disease, but we do not know whether screening improves the outcome. Evidence suggests that patients with cancer and a VTE should be treated with low-molecular-weight heparin, and treatment continued until the cancer is cured.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A G Fennerty (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: