Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A two-step probabilistic structural health monitoring approach is used to analyze the Phase II experimental benchmark studies sponsored by the IASC–ASCE Task Group on Structural Health Monitoring. This study involves damage detection and assessment of the test structure using experimental data generated by hammer impact and ambient vibrations. The two-step approach involves modal identification followed by damage assessment using the pre- and postdamage modal parameters based on the Bayesian updating methodology. An Expectation–Maximization algorithm is proposed to find the most probable values of the parameters. It is shown that the brace damage can be successfully detected and assessed from either the hammer or ambient vibration data. The connection damage is much more difficult to reliably detect and assess because the identified modal parameters are less sensitive to connection damage, allowing the modeling errors to have more influence on the results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ching et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: