Why the study?
The study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of text message reminders on medication adherence and to investigate their effects on clinical outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease.
Do text message reminders improve medication adherence in patients with coronary heart disease?
Do text message reminders improve medication adherence in patients with coronary heart disease?
Text message reminders significantly improve medication adherence and reduce systolic blood pressure and cholesterol levels in patients with coronary heart disease.
Text message reminders merit routine consideration in coronary heart disease care; confirms pooled RCT benefits on adherence and select risk-factor control.
BACKGROUND: To determine the effectiveness of text message reminders (TMR) on medication adherence (MA) and to investigate the effects of TMR on clinical outcomes. METHODS: The PubMed, Cochrane library, EMbase, and China Biology Medicine databases were searched for randomized-controlled trials with TMR as the intervention for patients with coronary heart disease. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. Meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 15.0 software. RESULTS: In total, 1678 patients in 6 trials were included. Compared with the control group, the MA was 2.85 times greater among the intervention group (RR [relative risk] 2.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-7.58). TMR reduced systolic blood pressure (BP) (weighted mean difference) = -6.51; 95% CI -9.79 to -3.23), cholesterol (standard mean difference = -0.26; 95% CI -0.4 to -0.12) and increased the number of patients with BP <140/90 mm Hg (RR 1.39; 95% CI 1.26-1.54). CONCLUSION: TMR significantly promoted MA and reduced systolic BP, cholesterol level, and body mass index, but had no effect on mortality, diastolic BP, or lipoproteins. However, substantial heterogeneity existed in our analyses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: