Why the study?
The study investigated the association of lung function at mid-life, later in life, and its 20-year decline, with arterial stiffness later in life.
Does lung function at mid-life and its decline over 20 years predict central arterial stiffness in later life in a population free of lung disease?
Does lung function at mid-life and its decline over 20 years predict central arterial stiffness in later life in a population free of lung disease?
Higher lung function at mid-life is associated with lower central arterial stiffness 20 years later, highlighting a link between respiratory health and vascular aging.
Declining lung function was associated with higher later-life arterial stiffness; leaves open causal links and clinical utility for risk stratification.
We investigated the association of lung function at mid-life, later in life, and its 20-year decline, with arterial stiffness later in life. We examined 5720 Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study participants who attended Visits 1 (1987-1989) and 5 (2011-2013). Lung function measures were forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV 1 ) and forced vital capacity (FVC), obtained at Visits 1, 2 (1990–1992), and 5. Central artery stiffness (carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity [cfPWV]) was measured at Visit 5. We evaluated associations of lung function with later-life central artery stiffness and cfPWV >75th percentile by multivariable linear and logistic regressions. Lung function at Visit 1 (FEV 1 β: −26, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: −48, −5; FVC β: −14, 95% CI: −32, 5) and Visit 5 (FEV 1 β: −22, 95% CI: −46, 2; FVC β: −18, 95% CI: −38, 2) were inversely associated with cfPWV at Visit 5, and with odds of high cfPWV in fully adjusted models. Twenty-year decline in lung function was not associated with continuous or dichotomous measures of arterial stiffness (FEV 1 β: 11, 95% CI: −46, 68; FVC β: −4, 95% CI: −52, 43). Lung function at mid-life and late-life was inversely associated with arterial stiffness in later life.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peter‐Marske et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: