Why the study?
Do multiplex qPCR and CNVplex assays provide reliable reproducibility and specificity compared to MLPA for the diagnosis of spinal muscular atrophy?
Do multiplex qPCR and CNVplex assays provide reliable reproducibility and specificity compared to MLPA for the diagnosis of spinal muscular atrophy?
Multiplex qPCR and CNVplex assays are highly accurate and reproducible alternatives to MLPA for the clinical diagnosis and carrier screening of spinal muscular atrophy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
New SMA gene-dosage assays may aid diagnosis; leaves open larger validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is mainly caused by deletions in SMA-related genes. The objective of this study was to develop gene-dosage assays for diagnosing SMA. METHODS: A multiplex, quantitative PCR assay and a CNVplex assay were developed for determining the copy number of SMN1, SMN2, and NAIP. Reproducibility and specificity of the two assays were compared to a multiple ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) assay. To evaluate reproducibility, 30 samples were analyzed three times using the three assays. A total of 317 samples were used to assess the specificity of the two assays. RESULTS: The multiplex quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay had higher reproducibility. Intra-assay CVs were 3.01%-8.52% and inter-assay CVs were 4.12%-6.24%. The CNVplex assay had ratios that were closer to expected (0.49-0.5 for one copy, 1.03-1.0 for two copies, and 1.50-1.50 for three copies). Diagnostic accuracy rates for the two assays were 100%. CONCLUSIONS: The multiplex qPCR assay was a simple, rapid, and cost-effective method for routine SMA diagnosis and carrier screening. The CNVplex assay could be used to detect SMAs with complicated gene structures. The assays were reliable and could be used as alternative methods for clinical diagnosis of SMA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liang et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: