Why the study?
Does CYP2C19*2 genotype explain the variability in on-treatment platelet reactivity in clopidogrel pretreated patients undergoing elective coronary stenting?
Does CYP2C19*2 genotype explain the variability in on-treatment platelet reactivity in clopidogrel pretreated patients undergoing elective coronary stenting?
While the CYP2C19*2 loss-of-function polymorphism is associated with high on-treatment platelet reactivity, it explains only a modest portion of the interindividual variability in clopidogrel response.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CYP2C19*2 testing alone may not predict clopidogrel response; leaves open contributions of other genetic and clinical factors to platelet reactivity variability.
BACKGROUND: An inadequate response to clopidogrel is mainly attributable to the variable formation of its active metabolite. The CYP2C19*2 loss-of-function polymorphism leads to reduced generation of the active metabolite and is, similarly to high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR), associated with recurrent atherothrombotic events following coronary stent implantation. AIM: To determine the relative contribution of CYP2C19*2 genotype to HPR. METHODS AND RESULTS: CYP2C19*2 genotyping and platelet function testing using 5 and 20 μmol/l ADP-induced light transmittance aggregometry (LTA), the PlateletWorks assay and the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, were performed in 1069 clopidogrel pretreated patients undergoing elective coronary stenting (POPular study, http://clinicalTrials.gov/ NCT00352014). The relative contributions of CYP2C19*2 genotype and clinical variables to the interindividual variability of on-treatment platelet reactivity and the occurrence of HPR were established using multivariate regression models. CYP2C19*2 carrier status was associated with a more frequent occurrence of HPR. CYP2C19*2 genotype alone could explain 5.0%, 6.2%, 4.4% and 3.7% of the variability in 5 and 20 μmol/l ADP-induced LTA, the PlateletWorks assay and the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, respectively, which increased to 13.0%, 15.2%, 5.6% and 20.6% when clinical variables were considered as well. Besides the CYP2C19*2 genotype, multiple clinical variables could be identified as independent predictors of HPR, including age, gender, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, clopidogrel loading dose regimen, use of amlodipine and platelet count. CONCLUSION: The CYP2C19*2 loss-of-function polymorphism is associated with a more frequent occurrence of HPR. However, the part of the interindividual variability in on-treatment platelet reactivity explained by CYP2C19*2 genotype is modest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bouman et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: