Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to assess liquidity risk management (LRM) practices in Indonesian Islamic banking industry during the period 2000‐2007. Design/methodology/approach The paper constructs the LRM index (100 scale) which is composed of individual index of asset side; liability side; LRM policies; and the overall LRM index. Findings The index produces a “good” grade for the liquidity management practices in the Indonesian Islamic banking industry, represented by three Islamic banks which capture 82 percent of the total market share of the industry. However, the breakdown of the index of every Islamic bank suggests various achievements. Research limitations/implications It is found that the practices of LRM are not optimal yet based on some considerations explained in this paper. Further progressive actions have to be taken by the regulators and all industry's players to improve the LRM practices. Originality/value To the best of the author's knowledge, this is the first paper trying to assess how good the LRM in Indonesian Islamic banking is.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rifki Ismal (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: