Why the study?
It was unknown whether beliefs about medicines, drug attitudes, and depression independently predicted anticoagulant and antiarrhythmic adherence in patients with AF.
Do beliefs about medicines, drug attitudes, and depression predict anticoagulant and antiarrhythmic adherence in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Do beliefs about medicines, drug attitudes, and depression predict anticoagulant and antiarrhythmic adherence in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Patient concerns about anticoagulants, rather than depression, are significant predictors of nonadherence in atrial fibrillation, highlighting a modifiable target for clinical intervention.
Screening for depression and medication beliefs may flag adherence risk in AF; leaves open whether targeting these improves implementation-phase adherence.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: This study examined whether beliefs about medicines, drug attitudes, and depression independently predicted anticoagulant and antiarrhythmic adherence (focusing on the implementation phase of nonadherence) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: This cross-sectional study was part of a larger longitudinal study. Patients with AF (N = 118) completed the Patient Health Questionnaire-8. The Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire, Drug Attitude Inventory, and Morisky-Green-Levine Medication Adherence Scale (self-report adherence measure), related to anticoagulants and antiarrhythmics, were also completed. Correlation and multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in nonadherence to anticoagulants or antiarrhythmics. Greater concerns (r = 0.23, P = .01) were significantly, positively associated with anticoagulant nonadherence only. Depression and drug attitudes were not significantly associated with anticoagulant/antiarrhythmic adherence. Predictors reliably distinguished adherers and nonadherers to anticoagulant medication in the regression model, explaining 14% of the variance, but only concern beliefs (odds ratio, 1.20) made a significant independent contribution to prediction (χ = 11.40, P = .02, with df = 4). When entered independently into a regression model, concerns (odds ratio, 1.24) significantly explained 10.3% of the variance (χ = 7.97, P = .01, with df = 1). Regressions were not significant for antiarrhythmic medication (P = .30). CONCLUSIONS: Specifying medication type is important when examining nonadherence in chronic conditions. Concerns about anticoagulants, rather than depression, were significantly associated with nonadherence to anticoagulants but not antiarrhythmics. Anticoagulant concerns should be targeted at AF clinics, with an aim to reduce nonadherence and potentially modifiable adverse outcomes such as stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taylor et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: