Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The coupling of transcription and associated processes has been shown to be dependent on the RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) C-terminal repeat domain (CTD) and the phosphorylation of the heptad repeats of which it is composed (consensus sequence Y 1 S 2 P 3 T 4 S 5 P 6 S 7 ). Two primary S 2 position CTD kinases have been identified in higher eukaryotes: P-TEFb and CDK12/CyclinK. The more recently discovered CDK12 appears to act at the 3′-end of the transcription unit and has been identified as a tumor suppressor for ovarian cancer; however much is still unknown about the in vivo roles of CDK12/CyclinK. In an effort to further characterize these roles we have purified to near homogeneity and characterized, full-length, active, human CDK12/CyclinK, and identified hCDK12-associated proteins via mass spectrometry. We find that employing a "2A" peptide-linked multicistronic construct containing CDK12 and CyclinK results in the efficient production of active, recombinant enzyme in the baculovirus/Sf9 expression system. Using GST-CTD fusion protein substrates we find that CDK12/CyclinK prefers a substrate with unmodified repeats or one that mimics prephosphorylation at the S 7 position of the CTD; also the enzyme is sensitive to the inhibitor flavopiridol at higher concentrations. Identification of CDK12-associating proteins reveals a strong enrichment for RNA-processing factors suggesting that CDK12 affects RNA processing events in two distinct ways: Indirectly through generating factor-binding phospho-epitopes on the CTD of elongating RNAPII and directly through binding to specific factors. Background CDK12 helps to regulate DNA transcription and associated processes. Results Full-length and active CDK12 can be expressed using baculovirus and CDK12 interacts with many RNA processing factors. Conclusion CDK12 may affect RNA processing events both directly and indirectly. Significance A better understanding of CDK12 activities will be useful in deciphering the nuances of transcription and in drug discovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bartkowiak et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: