Why the study?
eHealth programs can lower blood pressure but also drive healthcare costs, prompting a review of the evidence on effectiveness, costs, and commonalities among high-effect, low-additional-cost programs.
Do eHealth programs reduce systolic blood pressure and healthcare costs in patients with hypertension compared to usual care?
Do eHealth programs reduce systolic blood pressure and healthcare costs in patients with hypertension compared to usual care?
eHealth programs for hypertension effectively lower systolic blood pressure but can increase costs, though high-volume programs used as partial replacement for usual care are more cost-effective.
Supports eHealth adoption in hypertension for added BP control; reinforces Level 1 evidence on digital interventions.
BACKGROUND: eHealth programs can lower blood pressure but also drive healthcare costs. This study aims to review the evidence on the effectiveness and costs of eHealth for hypertension and assess commonalities in programs with high effect and low additional cost. RESULTS: Overall, the incremental decrease in systolic blood pressure using eHealth, compared to usual care, was 3.87 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.98-4.77) mmHg at 6 months and 5.68 (95% CI 4.77-6.59) mmHg at 12 months' follow-up. High intensity interventions were more effective, resulting in a 2.6 (95% CI 0.5-4.7) (at 6 months) and 3.3 (95% CI 1.4-5.1) (at 12 months) lower systolic blood pressure, but were also more costly, resulting in €170 (95% CI 56-284) higher costs at 6 months and €342 (95% CI 128-556) at 12 months. Programs that included a high volume of participants showed €203 (95% CI 99-307) less costs than those with a low volume at 6 months, and €525 (95% CI 299-751) at 12 months without showing a difference in systolic blood pressure. Studies that implemented eHealth as a partial replacement, rather than addition to usual care, were also less costly (€119 (95% CI -38-201 at 6 months) and €346 (95% CI 261-430 at 12 months)) without being less effective. Evidence on eHealth programs for hypertension is ambiguous, heterogeneity on effectiveness and costs is high (I2 = 56-98%). CONCLUSION: Effective eHealth with limited additional costs should focus on high intensity interventions, involve a large number of participants and use eHealth as a partial replacement for usual care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blok et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: