Why the study?
No medical device for HFpEF has received FDA approval, largely due to the lack of an in vivo model of HFpEF hemodynamics to evaluate device effectiveness prior to clinical trials.
Can implantable soft robotic sleeves in a porcine model recapitulate HFpEF hemodynamics to evaluate device effectiveness?
Can implantable soft robotic sleeves in a porcine model recapitulate HFpEF hemodynamics to evaluate device effectiveness?
A novel tunable porcine model using soft robotic sleeves can accurately simulate HFpEF hemodynamics, providing a valuable platform for preclinical testing of heart failure devices.
Porcine HFpEF model enables preclinical device testing; leaves open clinical translation.
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a major challenge in cardiovascular medicine, accounting for ≈50% of all cases of heart failure. Despite the ongoing efforts, no medical device has yet received FDA approval. This is largely due to the lack of an in vivo model of the HFpEF hemodynamics, resulting in the inability to evaluate device effectiveness in vivo prior to clinical trials. Here, the development of a highly tunable porcine model of HFpEF hemodynamics is described using implantable soft robotic sleeves, where controlled actuation of a left ventricular and an aortic sleeve can recapitulate changes in ventricular compliance and afterload associated with a broad spectrum of HFpEF hemodynamic phenotypes. The feasibility of the proposed model in preclinical testing is demonstrated by evaluating the hemodynamic response of the model post‐implantation of an interatrial shunt device, which is found to be consistent with findings from in silico studies and clinical trials. This work overcomes limitations of prior HFpEF models, such as low hemodynamic accuracy, high costs, and long development phases. The versatile and adjustable platform introduced can transform HFpEF device development, aiming to enhance the lives of the 32 million people affected globally.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosalia et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: