Key result
Young ischemic stroke linked to ~150% higher ANA positivity vs older patients.
Why the study?
How do the risk factors for acute ischemic stroke differ between young and old patients?
Observational
How do the risk factors for acute ischemic stroke differ between young and old patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The study highlights age-specific differences in ischemic stroke etiology, emphasizing the need for detailed cardiac workup for atrial fibrillation in older patients and rheumatic heart disease in younger patients.
BACKGROUND: Stroke is an important cause of death and disability. Prevalence of stroke differs with age. The risk factors in young differ in comparison to the old age-group. In this study, risk factors of stroke in young are compared to the old age-group. AIM: To compare the established risk factors in young and old acute ischemic strokes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: levels. RESULTS: was found in 25% young and 32% old. Venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL) was reactive in 1.3% in young and 4% in old. Antinuclear antibody (ANA) was positive in 6.6% in young and 2.6% in old. From those tested, antiphospholipid antibody (APLA) was positive in 3.64% in young and 4.16% in old. CONCLUSION: Cardioembolic stroke was found equally in old as in young. The number of patients with rheumatic heart disease showed comparatively higher numbers in the young group, while atrial fibrillation was higher in the old age-group, signifying the importance of detailed cardiac workup and Holter monitoring in the old age-group when indicated. Serum vitamin B12 and homocysteine levels should be done routinely in the evaluation of ischemic stroke irrespective of the age of onset of stroke(s), as their levels were impaired equally in both young and old age-groups in our study. Dyslipidemia, traditionally regarded as a risk factor in old, also showed deranged values in the form of raised serum cholesterol and triglycerides in both age-groups. Positive VDRL, ANA, and APLA showed an increased trend in the old age-group in our study compared to the young age-group. Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and inadequate physical activity were significant risk factors associated with the old group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharma et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Acute Ischemic Stroke. Young age vs. Old age was evaluated on Risk factor prevalence (e.g., VDRL, ANA, APLA). In acute ischemic stroke patients, VDRL was reactive in 1.3% of young vs 4% of old, ANA was positive in 6.6% vs 2.6%, and APLA was positive in 3.64% vs 4.16%.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: