Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study proposes a new workflow for crop growth evaluation and yield calibration in the Soil and Water Assessment Tool Plus (SWAT+) model and evaluates its impact on simulated hydrological and biogeochemical processes. The workflow was applied for ten small agricultural catchments in Europe. A detailed demonstration is provided for the German catchment, Schwarzer Schöps. The workflow proved effective across all catchments, improving yield calibration from an initial R 2 of 0.5 to 0.84. The results show that evapotranspiration and soil moisture were only moderately affected by crop calibration in three catchments (Belgium, Czech Republic and Norway) and negligibly changed in the remaining ones. Sediment and nutrient balance were affected more strongly: sediment, nitrogen and phosphorus loss change reached 82% (Norway), 16% and 20% (Czech Republic), respectively. The proposed workflow is a valuable tool for improving the accuracy of SWAT+ simulations and can be used to support decision-making in environmental management. • A new workflow improves crop yield calibration in SWAT+ across Europe. • Crop yield calibration enhances model accuracy, raising R 2 from 0.5 to 0.84. • Evapotranspiration and soil moisture show mild changes after crop calibration. • Crop calibration strongly impacts sediment and nutrient balances in some areas. • The workflow supports better SWAT+ modeling for environmental management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Piniewski et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: