The apparent emissivity of the atmosphere ϵ, defined as the ratio of incoming long‐wave radiation to black‐body radiation at screen temperature T a , was measured under clear skies in the English Midlands and in the Sudan. At a zenith angle Z the emissivity was given by ϵ( Z ) = a + b In( usec Z ) where u is the reduced depth of precipitable water (cm). For a set of 46 scans in England, the mean values of a and b were 0·70±0·05 and 0·090 ± 0·002. Systematic deviations about these mean values could be ascribed to: (i) temperature gradients; (ii) aerosol. The Sudan measurements gave a = 0·67 ± 0·03 and b = 0·085 ± 0·002 consistent with the English results and observations already published. There is some evidence that minimum values of a have increased over the past 50 years. Integration over the hemisphere gives the flux density (Wm −2 ) of atmospheric radiation as 1·06 σ T a 4 − 119 ( T in K), where σ is Stefan's constant, or 5·5 T a + 213 ( T in °C). Radiation records by Dines and Dines (1927) for overcast skies are analysed to show that the angular distribution is the same as for cloudless skies; that the mean temperature of cloud base at their site was UK below screen temperature; and that when the mean fraction of cloud cover is c , the apparent emissivity is ϵ a ( c ) = (1 − 0·84 c )ϵ a (0) + 0·84 c .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Unsworth et al. (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: