This article discusses the impact of global transnationalism on postwar planning and considers the questions planning historians should address in future research. The topics assessed are planning and cosmopolitanism, the plurality of local planning practices, the stream of transnational influences on planning, and the modalities of power. The article considers comparative and transnational methodologies, and how they can best be applied to the postwar era.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosemary Wakeman (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: