Does mitral valve repair improve survival and reduce recurrence compared to mitral valve replacement in patients with acute bacterial endocarditis?
Mitral valve repair for active endocarditis is associated with better long-term survival and lower recurrence rates compared to valve replacement when complete eradication of infective tissue is possible.
Background/Objectives: Acute bacterial endocarditis (ABE) is a frequent situation and continues to be a challenge. Mitral valve involvement during acute bacterial endocarditis is often the result of the spread of the endocarditic process from the adjacent aortic valve. Mitral involvement, on the other hand, could also be an expression of the initial localization of the bacteria. The best option for treating mitral ABE is still a matter of debate. Recent reports have shown satisfactory results with mitral reconstructive techniques in the treatment of mitral ABE. In this study, we present a comprehensive review of our 10-year institutional experience in the surgical management of acute mitral endocarditis with a focus on technical considerations, outcomes, and the durability of mitral valve repair in this high-risk population. Methods: We queried the institutional database, cross-referencing patients admitted with a diagnosis of “acute bacterial endocarditis” with patients undergoing surgical procedures for “valvular disease” at our division. Out of 1136 valvular procedures listed in our PACS database, 180 patients were admitted with a diagnosis of active acute endocarditis, and 46 included treatment of the mitral valve. We analyzed and compared short- and long-term follow-up (ranging from 3 to 141 months with a mean of 42 ± 38 months) of these 46 patients, dividing them into two groups: mitral valve repair (MVr) and mitral valve replacement (MVR). Results: 18 (40%) patients underwent reconstructive treatment of the mitral valve, and 28 (60%) underwent mitral valve replacement. Cumulative in-hospital mortality was 10% (5 pts, all from the MVR group), however, with no difference between the two groups. A shorter time gap from diagnosis to surgery (60 years), and urgent surgical procedures. Finally, patients with MVr also experienced a favorable postoperative event-free curve for endocarditis recurrence (p = 0.0260) and time elapsed before recurrence (p = 0.0438). Conclusions: Mitral valve repair in the case of active endocarditis could be a treatment associated with more favorable outcomes, providing that a complete eradication of infective tissue can be accomplished. Conservative treatment, when feasible, seems to offer favorable cumulative long-term outcomes.
Musto et al. (Fri,) studied this question.